Where Is Housing on the Ballot in California?

Posted by Murtaza Baxamusa on October 31, 2016

This November’s election will see over 40 local ballot measures that are related to housing in cities and counties across California. Though not directly on a statewide ballot, housing has been at the forefront of many policy discussions this year. These discussions have ranged from out-of-control rents, to large numbers of homeless people on the streets, to gentrification in urban communities, to foreclosures, lack of public resources to subsidize housing, quality of life, and local control.

The following is a scan of housing-related ballot measures in The Golden State. With such a steeped interest in housing at a local level, and an expected high turnout this November, many advocates are watching with considerable interest how voters react. The outcome will shape the nature of discussion on housing policy for years to come.

1. Revenue and Funding Measures for Housing Production and Homeless Services

Jurisdiction: Alameda County

Measure A1: $580 million in general obligation bonds for housing.

 

Jurisdiction: Berkeley

Measure U1: Increases business license tax on landlords of market-rate apartments, intends to raise $4 million annually for affordable housing and homeless.

 

Jurisdiction: East Palo Alto

Measure O: Imposes 1.5 percent tax on gross residential rental receipts, generating $600,000 annually to fund affordable housing, tenant displacement, foreclosure prevention, and homelessness.

 

Jurisdiction: Healdsburg

Measure S: Levies a 2 percent hotel room tax, raising $530,000 annually dedicated to affordable housing services and programs.

 

Jurisdiction: Los Angeles

Measure HHH: $1.2 billion general obligation bond for 10,000 housing units for the homeless

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition J: Charter amendment to create a Homeless Housing and Services Fund. Beginning in 2018 and for the next 24 years, the city would allocate $50 million to the fund each year, adjusted based on changes in city revenues. Also creates a transportation fund.

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition C: Allows the city to spend the unused $261 million from a 1992 general obligation bond for seismic safety upgrades and convert those buildings to permanent affordable housing.

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition S: Allocates a share of the existing hotel room tax for family homeless services.

 

Jurisdiction: Santa Monica

Measure GS: Advisory measure allows half of revenue raised from a companion ½ cent sales tax to be spent on affordable housing and homeless services.

 

Jurisdiction: Santa Clara County

Measure A: $950 million general obligation bond to fund homeless services and affordable housing.

 

Jurisdiction: South Lake Tahoe

Measure Q: An advisory measure that allows the city to spend the sales tax increase from a companion measure on housing.

 

2. Anti-gentrification, Rent Control and Anti-Displacement Measures

Jurisdiction: Alameda

Measure L1: Rent Stabilization Ordinance limiting rent increases to once a year, requiring mediation for all increases above 5 percent, limiting grounds for evictions, and requiring landlords to pay relocation fees when terminating certain tenancies.

 

Jurisdiction: Alameda

Measure M1: Charter amendment with rents “rolled back” to May 5, 2015 levels.  The annual allowable rent increase is limited to 65 percent of the Consumer Price Index.

 

Jurisdiction: Berkeley

Measure AA: Increases protection for renters and relocation assistance under Rent Stabilization Ordinance.

 

Jurisdiction: Burlington

Measure R: Establishes rent stabilization and just cause for evictions. Rent increases are tied to inflation, but limited to 1 to 4 percent annually.

 

Jurisdiction: East Palo Alto

Measure J: Strengthens and clarifies the existing Rent Stabilization and Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance.

 

Jurisdiction: Humboldt County

Measure V: Preserves mobile home parks in unincorporated areas of Humboldt County by regulating fee spikes when a home is sold and limiting monthly lot rents to annual increases at the consumer price index.

 

Jurisdiction: Mountain View

Measure V: Charter amendment establishes rent stabilization with increases between 2 to 5 percent tied to inflation. A competing Measure W establishes an ordinance with dispute resolution.

 

Jurisdiction: Oakland

Measure JJ: Expands the Just Cause Eviction Ordinance to more apartments and requires that landlords request approval from the city before increasing rents by more than the cost-of-living adjustment.

 

Jurisdiction: Richmond

Measure L: Establishes just cause for evictions and a Rent Board to set a maximum allowable rent for rent-controlled residential units in the city. Apartments built before 1995 cannot be raised more than 3 percent annually, based on the Consumer Price Index.

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition Q: Prohibits the city from removing unauthorized tents from public sidewalks unless the city offers shelter for all tent residents and stores the residents’ personal property for up to 90 days.

 

Jurisdiction: San Mateo

Measure Q: Charter amendment to control increase in rents, rolls back rents to September 2015, and establishes just cause for eviction.

 

3. Regulatory Changes to Affordable Housing Supply

Jurisdiction: Berkeley

Measure Z1: Authorizes any public agency to develop 500 units of affordable housing.

 

Jurisdiction: Encinitas

Measure T: Adopts a new Housing Element.

 

Jurisdiction: Eureka

Measure O: Increases current limit on affordable housing from 250 units to 3 percent of total housing units.

 

Jurisdiction: Los Angeles

Measure JJJ: Require developers to include affordable units in new residential buildings and to hire local construction workers at the prevailing wage.

 

Jurisdiction: San Diego

Measure M: Increase by 38,680 the maximum number of housing units the city and certain other public agencies are allowed to develop.

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition P: Affordable housing projects on city owned property must receive three bids and follow certain criteria.

 

Jurisdiction: San Francisco

Proposition U: Increases income eligibility of new and existing affordable housing units to 110 percent of the area median income (e.g. $118,450 for a family of 4).

 

Jurisdiction: Healdsburg

Measure R: Increases inclusionary housing requirements to 30 percent and removes (growth management) restrictions on number of new units.

 

4. Density and Growth Management

Jurisdiction: Camarillo

Measure J: Extends the term of the current Urban Growth Boundary and adds more restrictions.

 

Jurisdiction: Costa Mesa

Measure Y: Requires voter approval of certain sized projects as well as plan amendments.

 

Jurisdiction: Cotati

Measure Q: Establishes Urban Growth Boundary.

 

Jurisdiction: Del Mar

Measure R: Requires voter approval of certain planning and zoning changes, such as increased density.

 

Jurisdiction: Fillmore

Measure A, G: Related to extending the term of current Urban Growth Boundary.

 

Jurisdiction: Gilroy

Measure H: Adds an Urban Growth Boundary to the General Plan.

 

Jurisdiction: Milpitas

Measure I: Adds an Urban Growth Boundary to the General Plan, preventing growth in the hillside areas. A companion measure prohibits re-zoning of open space to residential space without a two-thirds vote of the people.

 

Jurisdiction: Moorpark

Measure E: Establishes Urban Growth Boundary.

 

Jurisdiction: Morgan Hill

Measure S: Slows the rate of population growth.

 

Jurisdiction: Oxnard

Measure K: Extends the term of the current Urban Growth Boundary and adds more restrictions on conversion of agricultural land.

 

Jurisdiction: Santa Paula

Measure U: Expands and extends the Urban Growth Boundary

 

Jurisdiction: Simi Valley

Measure Z: Extends the term of the current Urban Growth Boundary.


Jurisdiction: Sonoma County

Measure K: Voter approval required for density increases in “community separators.”


Jurisdiction: Thousand Oaks

Measure W: Extends the term of the current Urban Growth Boundary.


Jurisdiction: Santa Monica

Measure LV: Requires voter approval of major development projects and all development agreements.


Jurisdiction: Ventura County

Measure F: Extends the term of current voter requirements for conversion of agricultural land and open space.

(Photo credit: openDemocracy via flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0)

About the author more »

Murtaza Baxamusa, PhD, AICP, is the Director of Planning and Development for the San Diego County Building and Construction Trades Council Family Housing Corporation, and teaches community planning at the Sol Price School of Public Policy at the University of Southern California (USC). He received his doctoral degree in planning from USC, and is certified by the American Planning Association.

If you like this article, please subscribe to Shelterforce in print or make a small donation to keep Rooflines strong.

COMMENTS

 

There are no comments on this article yet. Start the discussion below.

POST YOUR COMMENTS register or login